Posts tagged ·

zen practice

·...

does compassion have a down-side?

Silly question, you say? Isn’t that what your life is all about? To suffer-with others in order to be their companion, helper, and guide? Doesn’t your heart delight in the phrases of the 8th Century Indian writer Shantideva, who spells out the aspirations of a compassionate being, a Bodhisattva:

May the virtue that I have acquired by doing all this relieve every suffering of sentient beings!

With showers of food and drink may I overcome the afflictions of hunger and thirst! May I become food and drink during times of famine.

May I be an inexhaustible treasury for the destitute! With various forms of assistance may I remain in their presence.

Yes, you say: that’s my intention. To be of service, that’s my vow. So why this weird subject line to today’s blog post? How can there be a down-side, a disadvantage, a problem with compassion. What’s going on?

Well, yes. But … someone’s giving me the creeps. While working in the garden a few weeks ago, a man stopped by with his bicycle. He told me a story, several stories in fact, of where he used to live, what he used to do, and so on. And now he lives ‘on the street,’ in a tent that he puts up each evening and must take down by 7 am (city bylaw). How he makes do with collecting bottles and cans, and welfare payments. He offered to wash the windows of my house (“used to do it for a living, up to 32 stories high”), gave me a decent quote, and asked for a down payment “so I can buy a new tire for my bike.” From there, one story led to another, about getting a ticket for riding without a helmet, needing to buy smokes (“my nicotine addition”), food (“the shelter doesn’t serve on weekends”), and so on.

After that I didn’t see him for a days on end. Weeks later, the windows are only partially washed, and not even very well at that. Last night at 10 pm there was a loud knock at the door and there he was, asking to trade some unlabeled bottles of wine (“I know you like wine, I’ve seen your bottles”) for cash to buy breakfast. His clothing was tattered, so I offered him a water-proof hiking jacket someone gave me and a pair of running shoes still in good shape. We agreed that he’d come back in the morning to finish washing the windows. He keeps calling me “boss.”

And now what? Now you’re afraid that he’s adopted you as his soft touch, a bleeding heart, an easy mark: someone who’ll believe any story and come through with handouts? Someone he can come to at any hour of the day and ask for help? What is your problem? 

“Compassion is an unpopular word nowadays,” writes David Brandon. “It points towards commitment, involvement, caring, love and generosity of heart. These are directions closely related to feeling and sentiment, sources of considerable embarrassment for [a modern person]. It is less dangerous to be cool than passionate in contemporary society. However, compassion lies at the heart of all helping; without it relationships between people are like dry leaves in the wind.”

source: Brandon, D. (1990). Zen and the art of helping. Arkana, p. 47; image: www.bikeportland.com 


Filed under: anxiety, bearing witness, being of service, Buddhist practice, conscious living, generosity, psycho-spiritual development, Zen practice Tagged: Bodhisattva, compassion, helping, homeless, personal boundaries, Shantideva
Comments Off

simple ways of seeing

Near the end of Monday’s retreat we stepped outside for kinhin, walking meditation. Instead of walking in lock-step formation as is customary at Zen centres, we each went off in separate directions. “Aim for an object: a tree, a shrub, a clump of flowers, or the fountain over there,” I suggested. “Walk slowly, with attention on the sole of your feet. Inhale as you lift a foot, exhale as you place it. Take time. When you reach the object, stand still for a while and look at what’s before you.

See what is there! Standing upright, inspect and take in as much information as possible: shapes, colours, spaces in between, moisture, things that move and those that seem solid. All the while, notice your breath, in-breath and out-breath, again and again. Become aware – be mindful — of whatever arises inside and in front of you. After a little while, bow and turn to walk towards the next object.”

Once the bell announced the end of the exercise, we gathered on a bench and chairs barely dry from the first rain in weeks. “What did you see?” I invited. The leaves of the tree rustled in the wind above me, it felt as if a wave of energy washed over me, said one. 

I walked towards the flower bed, the scent of lavender drawing me there. I stood — couldn’t help to pinch a blossom and look at it very closely. Tiny bugs were crawling in and out of the little flowers, offered another.

I saw a raindrop suspended from the branch of the elm tree, someone said, I saw leaves and the sky magnified upside down, something to do with optics. I felt like a child making a discovery.

Enlightenment is like the moon reflected on the water.
The moon does not get wet, nor is the water broken.
Although its light is wide and great,
The moon is reflected even in a puddle an inch wide.
The whole moon and the entire sky
Are reflected in one dewdrop on the grass.

~Japanese Zen master Dogen Zenji (1200-1253)

Further reading on walking and meditating: Coleman, M. (2006). Awake in the wild: mindfulness in nature as a path to self-discovery. New World Library. image: www.estatevaults.com.


Filed under: conscious living, meditating, mindfulness, poetry, Zen practice, Zen teachers Tagged: Dogen, kinhin, nature, seeing, walking meditation
Comments Off

worthy of an upgrade

I’m teaching today and won’t be able to post till later. Before heading out I found this comment by Chong Go Sunim, a blogger-friend who lives as a monk in Korea. On the topic of “what am I afraid of” (see my post of Sunday) he writes:

I think one of the biggest hindrances here are the little attachments that I don’t notice are there most of the time. It’s only when something really serious happens, or is about to happen, that I become aware of them.

I think the fear is also in relation to what I don’t know and can’t control. So in that sense, letting go of these things while alive might be good preparation.

I once reserved a cheap room in a really nice hotel for one night. When I got to the room (tiny and dingy), I discovered it was also a smoking room, even though I’d requested non-smoking. I drug my too-heavy suitcase back down to the lobby and spoke to the clerk. She started typing and frowning, typing and frowning, until a few minutes later she suddenly smiled and said she had a room for me. Well, the room she gave me was incredible. Huge bed, bright, wood floors, antique writing desk, and a bathroom that was enormous. That room was so nice I utterly forgot about the first room, my dissapointment, and the hassles of dragging my luggage around. It was about a week before I even remembered about that part of my trip.

I guess the moral is live a life worthy of an upgrade and don’t worry about the outcome. It will be so nice that you’ll completely forget about all the hassles that came before.

image: www.crazyjunkyard.com


Filed under: anxiety, Buddhist practice, conscious living, Zen practice Tagged: Chong Go Sunim, everyday fears, fear
Comments Off

to err is human

 
 
In the past, when I began to study Zen,
it was all a mistake.
Wandering through numberless
mountains and rivers,
I wanted to find
something to know.
(It’s all clear in hindsight.)
It is hard to understand it
because talk about “no-mind”
just brings more confusion.
 
The teacher has pointed out
the ancient mirror
and I see in it
the time before I was born of my parents.
 
Having learned this,
what do I have?
Release a crow into the night
and it flies
flecked with snow.
 
Note: “ancient mirror” refers to wisdom, to what is true, unspoiled; “before I was born of my parents” refers to our Buddha or true nature, before we were shaped and conditioned. By Dayang Jingxuan (n. d.) found at http://zenhsin.org/blog/. image: “Cawing crow on snow covered branch” by Koson; woodblock, ca. 1912, www.roningallery.com. 

Filed under: conscious living, poetry, Zen practice, Zen teachings Tagged: ancient mirror, Dayang Jingxuan, Japanese Zen, Ronin Gallery, Zen poetry
Comments Off

beginner’s mind

The most important thing is to forget all gaining ideas, all dualistic ideas. In other words, just practice [meditation] in a certain posture. Do not think about anything. Just remain on your cushion without expecting anything. Then eventually you will resume your own true nature. That is to say, your own true nature resumes itself.”

source: Shunryu Suzuki (2006, reissued). Zen mind, beginners mind. Boston: Shambhala, p. 46. Suzuki Roshi (1905-1971) founded the Zen Center of San Francisco.


Filed under: meditating, Zen practice, Zen teachers Tagged: beginner's mind, San Francisco Zen Center, Shunryu Suzuki
Comments Off

Seeing Buddha’s Face with Shakyamuni’s Eyes – Face-To-Face Transmission

As in all the great spiritual and literary traditions, in Zen Buddhism the experience of awakening, realization of nirvana, Buddhahood, or satori (enlightenment) are described in terms of vision (rather than hearing). To hear the Buddha Dharma is to learn about it and to study it, to see the Buddha Dharma is to experience it directly; to see it face to face — to see Shakyamuni Buddha’s face with our eyes, to see our face with Shakyamuni Buddha’s eyes.

Dogen wrote:

By bowing down in respect to the Face of Shakyamuni Buddha and by transferring the Eye of Shakyamuni Buddha to our own eyes, we will have transferred our eyes to the Eye of Buddha. Ours will be the very Eye and Face of Buddha. Without even one generation’s break, that which has been conferred face-to-face right up to the present by the mutual Transmission of this Buddha Eye and Buddha Face is this very Face-to-Face Transmission. These successive heirs over some dozens of generations are instances of face after face being the Face of Buddha, for they have received the Face-to-Face Transmission from the original Buddha Face. Their bowing down in respect to this conferring of the Face as the genuine Transmission is their respectful bowing down to the Seven Buddhas, including Shakyamuni Buddha, and it is their bowing in respect and making venerative offerings to the twenty-eight Indian Ancestors of the Buddha from Makakasho on down. This is what the Face and Eye of an Ancestor of the Buddha is like. To encounter this Ancestor of the Buddha is to meet Shakyamuni Buddha along with the other Seven Buddhas. It is the very instant when an Ancestor of the Buddha personally confers the Face-to-Face Transmission upon himself: it is a Buddha of the Face-to-Face Transmission conferring the Face-to-Face Transmission upon a Buddha of the Face-to-Face Transmission.
Shobogenzo, Menju, Hubert Nearman

Peace,
Ted

Comments Off

Existence-Time: Great Realization, Great Delusion

Truly, great realization is limitless, and returning to delusion is limitless.
Shobogenzo, Daigo, Gudo Nishijima & Mike (Chodo) Cross

The Zen masters assert that all the myriad things are Buddha. Thus, if there is anything real in the particular mistaken views that block us from seeing truth, it too must be Buddha.

In Dogen’s works “Great Delusion” is given equal status with “Great Enlightenment,” being nondual, these two are co-essential and co-extensive. In his teachings on the unity of “existence” and “time” (uji; “existence-time”), existence (dharmas; actual things, beings, etc.) is time, rather than in time (and vice versa). As all existence (Buddha) is all time, existence-time is eternal and infinite.If “realization” was limited, it could not be eternal; if delusion was limited, it could not be infinite. A first great realization (kensho) is the great realization that great realization is existence-time, is, has been, and will be Buddha.

Even before we have realized what the Buddha promised, expressing our Buddha Nature by expressing our intent is already the Way of Buddhas. At the same time, it is through our expressing our True Nature by expressing our intent that we realize what the Buddha promised. We must not explore through our training that ‘realizing what the Buddha promised’ is restricted to the first great realization of a deluded person. The deluded have their great realization, and the enlightened have their great realization, and the unenlightened have their great realization, and the undeluded have their great realization, and all those who have realized what the Buddha promised have actually realized what the Buddha promised.
Shobogenzo, Sesshin Sessho, Hubert Nearman

Peace,

Ted

Comments Off

Superior & Inferior Aspects of Zen Practice-Enlightenment?

In reality, reading and studying the teachings of Buddhism and engaging in the physical activity of Buddhism (including seated meditation) are not two separate things. All aspects of the Buddha Dharma are the Buddha Dharma. For Dogen it is meaningless to talk about the Buddha Dharma in terms primary and secondary or superior and inferior aspects and methods; authenticity is simply authenticity.

Dogen writes:

I say: Remember, among Buddhists we do not argue about superiority and inferiority of philosophies, or choose between shallowness and profundity in the Dharma; we need only know whether the practice is genuine or artificial.
Shobogenzo, Bendowa, Gudo Nishijima & Chodo Cross

Peace,
Ted

Comments Off

Bodhicitta – Enlightened Thinking, Bodhi (enlightenment) Citta (thinking mind)

Dogen on Bodhicitta (the mind, or thought of enlightenment).

In general there are three kinds of mind. “The first, citta, is here called thinking mind. The second, hrdaya, is here called the mind of grass and trees. The third, vrddha, is here called experienced and concentrated mind.” Among these, the bodhi-mind is inevitably established relying upon thinking mind. Bodhi is the sound of an Indian word; here it is called “the truth.” Citta is the sound of an Indian word; here it is called “thinking mind.” Without this thinking mind it is impossible to establish the bodhi-mind. That is not to say that this thinking mind is the bodhi-mind itself, but we establish the bodhi-mind with this thinking mind. To establish the bodhi-mind means to vow that, and to endeavor so that, “Before I myself cross over, I will take

across all living beings.” Even if their form is humble, those who establish this mind are already the guiding teachers of all living beings. This mind is not innate and it does not now suddenly arise; it is neither one nor many; it is not natural and it is not formed; it does not abide in our body, and our body does not abide in the mind. This mind does not pervade the Dharma world; it is neither of the past nor of the future; it is neither present nor absent; it is not of a subjective nature, it is not of an objective nature, it is not of a combined nature, and it is not of a causeless nature. Nevertheless, at a place where there is mystical communication of the truth, establishment of the bodhimind occurs. It is not conferred upon us by the buddhas and bodhisattvas, and it is beyond our own ability. Establishment of the mind occurs during mystical communication of the truth, and so it is not inherent. Shobogenzo, Hotsu Bodaishin, Gudo Nishijima & Mike (Chodo) Cross

Comments Off

Does a Falling Tree make a Sound When Nobody is there to Hear it?

Does a Falling Tree make a Sound When Nobody is there to Hear it?

As it presupposes dualism (between “things” (dharmas) in themselves and “things” as represented) the representational view of knowledge and experience is definitely rejected in Zen Buddhism, as it is in Mahayana Buddhism generally. In Zen, all real dharmas (things, beings, instances, events, etc.) are actualized (not re-actualized, or represented) insofar as they are experienced by sentient beings.

So then, the falling tree makes no sound if no one experiences it, and in fact, there is no such thing as a falling tree that no one experiences. A tree, a human being (or any dharma) is only a real dharma if someone (a “self” or an “other”) experiences it. One obvious implication of this is that whatever (or whoever) does experience beings (or other dharmas) must also be real. This aspect of reality is one of the central topics of Dogen’s Shobogenzo.

When speaking of consciousness of self and other, there is a self and an other in what is known; there is a self and an other in what is seen.
Shobogenzo, Shoaku Makusa, Hubert Nearman

In Buddhism, as we know, experience and experiencer are nondual, and each is (like all dharmas) one with the whole universe. But the Zen masters certainly do not let matters rest there; they constantly exhorts us to look deeply and come to understand how the myriad dharmas differ, relate, and interact with each other and the rest of the world. Dogen’s Shobogenzo, for example, is a marvelous demonstration of how this task is accomplished.

Comments Off