Posts tagged ·

Zen masters

·...

Existence-Time: Great Realization, Great Delusion

Truly, great realization is limitless, and returning to delusion is limitless.
Shobogenzo, Daigo, Gudo Nishijima & Mike (Chodo) Cross

The Zen masters assert that all the myriad things are Buddha. Thus, if there is anything real in the particular mistaken views that block us from seeing truth, it too must be Buddha.

In Dogen’s works “Great Delusion” is given equal status with “Great Enlightenment,” being nondual, these two are co-essential and co-extensive. In his teachings on the unity of “existence” and “time” (uji; “existence-time”), existence (dharmas; actual things, beings, etc.) is time, rather than in time (and vice versa). As all existence (Buddha) is all time, existence-time is eternal and infinite.If “realization” was limited, it could not be eternal; if delusion was limited, it could not be infinite. A first great realization (kensho) is the great realization that great realization is existence-time, is, has been, and will be Buddha.

Even before we have realized what the Buddha promised, expressing our Buddha Nature by expressing our intent is already the Way of Buddhas. At the same time, it is through our expressing our True Nature by expressing our intent that we realize what the Buddha promised. We must not explore through our training that ‘realizing what the Buddha promised’ is restricted to the first great realization of a deluded person. The deluded have their great realization, and the enlightened have their great realization, and the unenlightened have their great realization, and the undeluded have their great realization, and all those who have realized what the Buddha promised have actually realized what the Buddha promised.
Shobogenzo, Sesshin Sessho, Hubert Nearman

Peace,

Ted

Comments Off

Bodhicitta – Enlightened Thinking, Bodhi (enlightenment) Citta (thinking mind)

Dogen on Bodhicitta (the mind, or thought of enlightenment).

In general there are three kinds of mind. “The first, citta, is here called thinking mind. The second, hrdaya, is here called the mind of grass and trees. The third, vrddha, is here called experienced and concentrated mind.” Among these, the bodhi-mind is inevitably established relying upon thinking mind. Bodhi is the sound of an Indian word; here it is called “the truth.” Citta is the sound of an Indian word; here it is called “thinking mind.” Without this thinking mind it is impossible to establish the bodhi-mind. That is not to say that this thinking mind is the bodhi-mind itself, but we establish the bodhi-mind with this thinking mind. To establish the bodhi-mind means to vow that, and to endeavor so that, “Before I myself cross over, I will take

across all living beings.” Even if their form is humble, those who establish this mind are already the guiding teachers of all living beings. This mind is not innate and it does not now suddenly arise; it is neither one nor many; it is not natural and it is not formed; it does not abide in our body, and our body does not abide in the mind. This mind does not pervade the Dharma world; it is neither of the past nor of the future; it is neither present nor absent; it is not of a subjective nature, it is not of an objective nature, it is not of a combined nature, and it is not of a causeless nature. Nevertheless, at a place where there is mystical communication of the truth, establishment of the bodhimind occurs. It is not conferred upon us by the buddhas and bodhisattvas, and it is beyond our own ability. Establishment of the mind occurs during mystical communication of the truth, and so it is not inherent. Shobogenzo, Hotsu Bodaishin, Gudo Nishijima & Mike (Chodo) Cross

Comments Off

Does a Falling Tree make a Sound When Nobody is there to Hear it?

Does a Falling Tree make a Sound When Nobody is there to Hear it?

As it presupposes dualism (between “things” (dharmas) in themselves and “things” as represented) the representational view of knowledge and experience is definitely rejected in Zen Buddhism, as it is in Mahayana Buddhism generally. In Zen, all real dharmas (things, beings, instances, events, etc.) are actualized (not re-actualized, or represented) insofar as they are experienced by sentient beings.

So then, the falling tree makes no sound if no one experiences it, and in fact, there is no such thing as a falling tree that no one experiences. A tree, a human being (or any dharma) is only a real dharma if someone (a “self” or an “other”) experiences it. One obvious implication of this is that whatever (or whoever) does experience beings (or other dharmas) must also be real. This aspect of reality is one of the central topics of Dogen’s Shobogenzo.

When speaking of consciousness of self and other, there is a self and an other in what is known; there is a self and an other in what is seen.
Shobogenzo, Shoaku Makusa, Hubert Nearman

In Buddhism, as we know, experience and experiencer are nondual, and each is (like all dharmas) one with the whole universe. But the Zen masters certainly do not let matters rest there; they constantly exhorts us to look deeply and come to understand how the myriad dharmas differ, relate, and interact with each other and the rest of the world. Dogen’s Shobogenzo, for example, is a marvelous demonstration of how this task is accomplished.

Comments Off

5 Favorite Zen Masters

Who are your five favorite Zen masters?

Mine are:

1 Dogen
2 Hakuin
3 Chinul
4 Joshu
5 Zongmi

Peace,
Ted

Comments Off

Huang Po On Seeing True Nature

Huang Po On Seeing True Nature

Q: What is implied by ‘seeing into the real Nature’?

A: That Nature and your perception of it are one. You cannot use it to see something over and above itself. That Nature and your hearing of it are one. You cannot use it to hear something over and above itself. If you form a concept of the true nature of anything as being visible or audible, you allow a dharma of distinction to arise. Let me repeat that the perceived cannot perceive. Can there, I ask you, be a head attached to the crown of your head?

Huang Po, The Zen Teaching of Huang Po, John Blofeld, p.116

Peace,

Ted

Comments Off

Dogen fans?

Dogen fan? If so, here are some links to a recent series of posts on our sister blog (Dogen and the Shobogenzo)

Thursday, July 01, 2010

Your Mountain and My Mountain – The Same Mountain?

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Comments Off

Creating Circumstance– and Not creating circumstances

Investigating the circumstances you create- and the circumstances you don't
.
By relying on the principle of ‘turning to the next’, you should, by all means, thoroughly investigate both your creating circumstances and your not creating circumstances. And by relying on the principle of ‘turning to the next’, you should thoroughly investigate both what you are concocting and what you are not concocting.
Shobogenzo, Juki, Hubert Nearman
.
Peace,
Ted
Comments Off

Dogen On Negotiating the Way – Bendowa

Kim On Dogen On Negotiating the Way

In his book, Dogen On Meditation and Thinking, Hee-Jin Kim offers an excellent statement on what this task entails. Following Masao Abe and Norman Waddell, Hee-Jin Kim translates “Bendowa” as “Negotiating the Way,” which he uses to describe what Dogen regards as the Zen “practitioners’ soteriological project.” Here is Kim:

In the Shobogenzo, “Bendowa” (1231), Dogen succinctly enunciates his Zen: “The endeavor to negotiate the Way (bendo), as I teach now, consists in discerning all things in view of enlightenment, and putting such a unitive awareness (ichinyo) into practice in the midst of the revaluated world (shutsuro).” This statement clearly sets forth practitioners’ soteriological project as negotiating the Way in terms of (1) discerning the nondual unity of all things that are envisioned from the perspective of enlightenment and (2) enacting that unitive vision amid the everyday world of duality now revalorized by enlightenment. Needless to say, these two aspects refer to practice and enlightenment that are nondually one (shusho itto; shusho ichinyo). ~Hee-Jin Kim, Dogen On Meditation and Thinking

Here, Kim skillfully expresses the fundamental point while simultaneously illumining some important implications. What he translates as “unitive awareness” is the experiential awareness (enlightened wisdom) of the nonduality of all things. As Kim so lucidly shows, the objective of the practitioner, as far as Dogen is concerned, is to “negotiate the Way” by actively utilizing this “unitive awareness” to discern (i.e. make out, distinguish, differentiate, discriminate, etc.) all things in the everyday world.

[Note: The qualifying terms “revaluated” and “revalorized” serve to emphasize the fact that the “everyday world” here means the real everyday world—as seen in view of enlightenment. This will come up later, now it is enough to note that Zen sayings about “ordinary mind” and “everyday world” are not references to what ordinary, unenlightened beings perceive as “mind” or “world.”]

Bendowa, one of Dogen’s earliest writings (perhaps his second), not only offers a good example of his view of nonduality, it also demonstrates how consistently he maintained it throughout his career. Bendowa was not included in Shobogenzo and apparently did not undergo revisions, as did most of the fascicles in Shobogenzo. Nevertheless, its strong language cautioning against distorted notions of “oneness” is remarkably harmonious with Shobogenzo fascicles edited near the end of his career. For instance, Bendowa contains Dogen’s first critique of the “Shrenika heresy,” which became a standard example for the “fallacy of naturalism” (essentialism) throughout Shobogenzo.

Peace,

Ted

Comments Off

Seven (7) Zen Masters On Words & Letters – sutras & koans (scriptures & sayings)

Seven (7) Classic Zen Masters On Sutras and Koans

-

Parshva attended the Buddhist master Punyamitre for three years, never once going to sleep. One day as Punyamitre was reciting a scripture and came to an exposition of the uncreated, Parshva attained enlightenment on hearing it.
Keizan, Transmission of Light, Thomas Cleary, p.44

-

I happened to hear that The Lotus Sutra was the king of all the scriptures… when I had finished, I closed it with a heavy sigh. “This,” I told myself, “is nothing but a collection of simple tales about cause and effect. True, mention is made of there being ‘only one absolute vehicle,’ and of ‘the changeless, unconditioned tranquillity of all dharmas.’ …
    
Meanwhile, I lived as the priest of a small temple. I reached forty, the age when one is not supposed to be bothered any longer by doubts. One night, I decided to take another look at The Lotus Sutra… I read as far as the third chapter, the one on parables. Then, just like that, all the lingering doubts and uncertainties vanished from my mind. They suddenly ceased to exist. The reason for the Lotus’s reputation as the “king of sutras” was now revealed to me with blinding clarity. Teardrops began cascading down my face like two strings of beads—they came like beans pouring from a ruptured sack. A loud involuntary cry burst from the depths of my being… I was finally able to penetrate the source of the free, enlightened activity that permeated Shoju’s daily life.
Hakuin, The Essential Teachings of Zen Master Hakuin, Norman Waddell, p.33

-

One day when Huineng went to market with a bundle of wood, he heard a traveler reciting the Diamond Cutter Scripture.  When the traveler reached the part where it says, “You should activate the mind without dwelling on anything,” Huineng experienced enlightenment.
Keizan, Transmission of Light, Thomas Cleary, p.138

-

There is another type of Zen teacher who tells people not to make logical assessments, that they lose contact the minute they speak, and should recognize the primordial. This kind of “teacher” has no explanation at all. This is like sitting on a balloon—where is there any comfort in it? It is also like the croaking of a bullfrog. If you entertain such a view, it is like being trapped in a black fog.
Foyan, Instant Zen, Thomas Cleary, p.46

-

There is originally no word for truth, but the way to it is revealed by words. The way originally has no explanation, but reality is made by explanation. That is why the buddhas appeared in the world with many expedient methods; the whole canon dispenses medicines according to diseases.
Shih-shuang, Zen Teachings, Thomas Cleary, p.51

-

From the Zen people of today, who are content to sit quietly submerged at the bottom of their “ponds of tranquil water,” you often hear this:“Don’t introspect koans. Koans are quagmires. They will suck your self-nature under. Have nothing to do with written words either. Those are a complicated tangle of vines that will grab hold of your vital spirit and choke the life from if.”
    
Don’t believe that for a minute! What kind of “self-nature” is it that can be “sucked under”? Is it like one of those yams or chestnuts you bury under the cooking coals? Any “vital spirit” that can be “grabbed and choked off” is equally dubious. Is it like when a rabbit or fox gets caught in a snare?  Where in the world do they find these things? The back shelves of some old country store? Wherever, it must be a very strange place.
    
No doubt about it, these are the miserable wretches Zen priest Ch’ang-sha said “confound the illusory working of their own minds for ultimate truth.” They’re like that great king master Ying-an T’an-hua talked about, who lives alone inside an old shrine deep in the mountains, never putting any of his wisdom to use.
Hakuin, The Essential Teachings of Zen Master Hakuin, Norman Waddell, p.24

-

One time, as Shitou was reading a famous Buddhist treatise, he came to the point where it says, “It seems that only a sage can understand that myriad things are oneself.” At this point he hit the desk and said, “A sage has no self, yet there is nothing that is not the self.  The body of reality is formless—who speaks of self and other?  The round mirror is marvelously bright—all things and the mysteries of their beings appear in it spontaneously.  Objects and knowledge are not one—who says they come or go to one another?  How true are the words of this treatise!”…

Having attained realization at a blow and succeeding in seeing clearly, he ranked as one of the Zen masters.
Keizan, Transmission of Light, Thomas Cleary, p.153

-

A bigoted believer in nihilism blasphemes against the sutras on the ground that literature [i.e., the Buddhist scriptures] is unnecessary [for the study of Buddhism]. If that were so, then neither would it be right for us to speak, since speech forms the substance of literature. He would also argue that in the direct method [literally, the straight path] literature is discarded. But does he appreciate that the two words ‘is discarded’ are also literature? Upon hearing others recite the sutras such a man would criticize the speakers as ‘addicted to scriptural authority’. It is bad enough for him to confine this mistaken notion to himself, but in addition, he blasphemes against the Buddhist scriptures. You men should know that it is a serious offence to speak ill of the sutras, for the consequence is grave indeed!
Hui-Neng, The Diamond Sutra & The Sutra of Hui-Neng, A. F. Price & Wong Mou-lam, p.144

-

When students are beginners, whether they have the mind of the Way or not, they should carefully read and study the Sagely Teachings of the sutras and shastras.
Dogen, Record of Things Heard, Col. Trans. of Thomas Cleary, Vol. 4, p.796

-

I have observed that people of the present time who are cultivating their minds do not depend on the guidance of the written teachings, but straightaway assume that the successive transmission of the esoteric idea [of Son] is the path. They then sit around dozing with their presence of mind in agitation and confusion during their practice of meditation. For these reasons, I feel you should follow words and teachings which were expounded in accordance with reality in order to determine the proper procedure in regard to awakening and cultivation. Once you mirror your own minds, you may contemplate with insight at all times, without wasting any of your efforts.
Chinul, Tracing Back the Radiance, Robert Buswell, p.151-152

-

How sad is the aridity of contemporary Zen schools! They laud unintelligent ignorance as transcendental direct-pointing Zen.  Considering unsurpassed spiritual treasures like Focusing the Precious Mirror and the Five Ranks to be worn-out utensils of an antiquated house, they pay no attention to them. They are like blind people throwing away their canes, saying they are useless, then getting themselves stuck in the mud of the view of elementary realization, never able to get out all their lives.
Hakuin, Kensho, Thomas Cleary, p.68-69

-

Peace,

Ted

Comments Off

Your Consciousness is the Buddha! – Huang Po

Zen wisdom on erroneous thoughts, your consciousness, and the Buddha

Q: At this moment, while erroneous thoughts are arising in my mind, where is the Buddha?

A: At this moment you are conscious of those erroneous thoughts. Well, your consciousness is the Buddha! Perhaps you can understand that, were you but free of these delusory mental processes, there would then be no ‘Buddha’. Why so? Because when you allow a movement of your mind to result in a concept of sentient beings in need of deliverance CREATES such beings as objects of your thoughts. All intellectual processes and movements of thought result from your concepts. If you were to refrain from conceptualizing altogether, where could the Buddha continue to exist? You are in the some predicament as Manjusri who, as soon as he permitted himself to conceive of the Buddha as an objective entity, was dwarfed and hemmed in on all sides by those two iron mountains.

~Zen Master Huang Po (Teacher of Master Linchi [Rinzai])

From, The Zen Teaching of Huang Po, Translated by John Blofeld, p.80-81

—–

Peace,

Ted

Comments Off