Posts tagged ·

prajna

·...

Because it is so very clear, it is hard to see

Now you know clearly: what is called ‘mind’ is the great earth with its mountains and rivers; it is the sun, the moon, and the stars.

Shobogenzo, Soku Shin Ze Butsu, Hubert Nearman

It really is that simple – the eyes are horizontal, the nose is vertical. There is nothing cryptic or esoteric about this, it is very easy to understand; if we read the Mahayana and Zen literature we will “know clearly” that Buddha is our mind, and this mind is the mountain, the wall, or whatever it is we are experiencing here and now. There is nothing hazy or obscure about the true Dharma; what could be less clear than the taste of this tea, or the sun before our eyes?

The mind that is sun, moon, and stars is simply sun, moon, and stars: there is no fog nor is there any mist to obscure its clarity.

Shobogenzo, Soku Shin Ze Butsu, Hubert Nearman

Peace,
Ted

Comments Off

Seeing Buddha’s Face with Shakyamuni’s Eyes – Face-To-Face Transmission

As in all the great spiritual and literary traditions, in Zen Buddhism the experience of awakening, realization of nirvana, Buddhahood, or satori (enlightenment) are described in terms of vision (rather than hearing). To hear the Buddha Dharma is to learn about it and to study it, to see the Buddha Dharma is to experience it directly; to see it face to face — to see Shakyamuni Buddha’s face with our eyes, to see our face with Shakyamuni Buddha’s eyes.

Dogen wrote:

By bowing down in respect to the Face of Shakyamuni Buddha and by transferring the Eye of Shakyamuni Buddha to our own eyes, we will have transferred our eyes to the Eye of Buddha. Ours will be the very Eye and Face of Buddha. Without even one generation’s break, that which has been conferred face-to-face right up to the present by the mutual Transmission of this Buddha Eye and Buddha Face is this very Face-to-Face Transmission. These successive heirs over some dozens of generations are instances of face after face being the Face of Buddha, for they have received the Face-to-Face Transmission from the original Buddha Face. Their bowing down in respect to this conferring of the Face as the genuine Transmission is their respectful bowing down to the Seven Buddhas, including Shakyamuni Buddha, and it is their bowing in respect and making venerative offerings to the twenty-eight Indian Ancestors of the Buddha from Makakasho on down. This is what the Face and Eye of an Ancestor of the Buddha is like. To encounter this Ancestor of the Buddha is to meet Shakyamuni Buddha along with the other Seven Buddhas. It is the very instant when an Ancestor of the Buddha personally confers the Face-to-Face Transmission upon himself: it is a Buddha of the Face-to-Face Transmission conferring the Face-to-Face Transmission upon a Buddha of the Face-to-Face Transmission.
Shobogenzo, Menju, Hubert Nearman

Peace,
Ted

Comments Off

Existence-Time: Great Realization, Great Delusion

Truly, great realization is limitless, and returning to delusion is limitless.
Shobogenzo, Daigo, Gudo Nishijima & Mike (Chodo) Cross

The Zen masters assert that all the myriad things are Buddha. Thus, if there is anything real in the particular mistaken views that block us from seeing truth, it too must be Buddha.

In Dogen’s works “Great Delusion” is given equal status with “Great Enlightenment,” being nondual, these two are co-essential and co-extensive. In his teachings on the unity of “existence” and “time” (uji; “existence-time”), existence (dharmas; actual things, beings, etc.) is time, rather than in time (and vice versa). As all existence (Buddha) is all time, existence-time is eternal and infinite.If “realization” was limited, it could not be eternal; if delusion was limited, it could not be infinite. A first great realization (kensho) is the great realization that great realization is existence-time, is, has been, and will be Buddha.

Even before we have realized what the Buddha promised, expressing our Buddha Nature by expressing our intent is already the Way of Buddhas. At the same time, it is through our expressing our True Nature by expressing our intent that we realize what the Buddha promised. We must not explore through our training that ‘realizing what the Buddha promised’ is restricted to the first great realization of a deluded person. The deluded have their great realization, and the enlightened have their great realization, and the unenlightened have their great realization, and the undeluded have their great realization, and all those who have realized what the Buddha promised have actually realized what the Buddha promised.
Shobogenzo, Sesshin Sessho, Hubert Nearman

Peace,

Ted

Comments Off

Ever already enlightened, ever already deluded

Ever already enlightened, ever already deluded

It is axiomatic to Zen that Buddha can never be found “outside” our own mind or nature. As Dogen asserts, there is not one “objective molecule” in the whole universe; the human body-mind (shinjin) is the whole universe in the ten directions. There is no Buddha in the “outside,” “natural,” or “external” world – except perhaps in the mind of a deluded being. According to Dogen, the universe exists as the world we produce (fashion) from our selection of experiential material (bits and pieces) which is manifest as the here and now that is presented (present-ed), arrayed, or demonstrated (arranged). In a word, it is genjokoan (actualization of the immediate experiential universe). The real, everyday world we experience here and now is not a separate realm in which we exist nor is it an outside or external aspect of our “self.” The world, in Dogen’s Zen, is not something that we are to passively accept, submit to, detach from, or conform ourselves to; the world is always and already us.

In Dogen’s Zen, demonstrating passive acceptance of the status quo or acquiescing to the authority of an “other” is an unequivocal demonstration of ignorance of true nature. Ignorance, like enlightenment, is both specific and bottomless (i.e. there is no such thing as “general ignorance,” thus its appearance in particular dharmas is not limited by any boundary), and Dogen’s assessment of the ignorance of humans is qualified by the specifics of individuals. Even Buddha and Zen ancestors are “ever deluded,” and it is the very definition of “beginners” to be unaware of their true nature; but when it comes to wanton ignorance – apathetic or indolent attempts to evade the necessary exertions of thoroughgoing study and wholehearted practice – Dogen’s contempt is unabashed. Indeed, we can all be grateful for the existence of apathetic and indolent beings; for it is to them that we owe, for one thing, some of the most humorous passages in the whole corpus of Dogen’s writings. For instance, check out these examples:

I say: We do not tell our dreams before a fool, and it is difficult to put oars into the hands of a mountaineer; nevertheless I must bestow the teaching.

Shobogenzo, Bendowa, Gudo Nishijima & Mike (Chodo) Cross

But if we learn this view as the Buddha’s Dharma, we are even more foolish than the person who grasps a tile or a pebble thinking t to be a golden treasure; the delusion would be too shameful for comparison.

Shobogenzo, Bendowa, Gudo Nishijima & Mike (Chodo) Cross

[Those who exclude women] are just very stupid fools who deceive and delude secular people. They are more stupid than a wild dog worrying that its burrow might be stolen by a human being.

Shobogenzo, Raihai-tokuzui, Gudo Nishijima & Mike (Chodo) Cross

The great master has never shown to the assembly any fist or wink of an eye that advocated the use of the name “Soto sect.” Furthermore, there was no flotsam mixed in among his disciples, and so there was no disciple who used the name “Tozan sect.” How much less could they speak of a “Soto sect”? The name “Soto sect” may be the result of including the name Sozan. In such a case, Ungo and Doan would have to be included too. Ungo is a guiding master in the human world and in the heavens above, and he is more venerable than Sozan. We can conclude, in regard to this name “Soto,” that some stinking skinbag belonging to a side lineage, seeing himself as equal [to Tozan], has devised the name “Soto sect.” Truly, though the white sun is bright, it is as if floating clouds are obscuring it from below.

Shobogenzo, Butsudo, Gudo Nishijima & Mike (Chodo) Cross

Peace,

Ted

Comments Off

Bodhicitta – Enlightened Thinking, Bodhi (enlightenment) Citta (thinking mind)

Dogen on Bodhicitta (the mind, or thought of enlightenment).

In general there are three kinds of mind. “The first, citta, is here called thinking mind. The second, hrdaya, is here called the mind of grass and trees. The third, vrddha, is here called experienced and concentrated mind.” Among these, the bodhi-mind is inevitably established relying upon thinking mind. Bodhi is the sound of an Indian word; here it is called “the truth.” Citta is the sound of an Indian word; here it is called “thinking mind.” Without this thinking mind it is impossible to establish the bodhi-mind. That is not to say that this thinking mind is the bodhi-mind itself, but we establish the bodhi-mind with this thinking mind. To establish the bodhi-mind means to vow that, and to endeavor so that, “Before I myself cross over, I will take

across all living beings.” Even if their form is humble, those who establish this mind are already the guiding teachers of all living beings. This mind is not innate and it does not now suddenly arise; it is neither one nor many; it is not natural and it is not formed; it does not abide in our body, and our body does not abide in the mind. This mind does not pervade the Dharma world; it is neither of the past nor of the future; it is neither present nor absent; it is not of a subjective nature, it is not of an objective nature, it is not of a combined nature, and it is not of a causeless nature. Nevertheless, at a place where there is mystical communication of the truth, establishment of the bodhimind occurs. It is not conferred upon us by the buddhas and bodhisattvas, and it is beyond our own ability. Establishment of the mind occurs during mystical communication of the truth, and so it is not inherent. Shobogenzo, Hotsu Bodaishin, Gudo Nishijima & Mike (Chodo) Cross

Comments Off

Fashioning Buddhas, Fashioning Human Beings – Dogen’s View

Dogen on creating, fashioning, and concocting

Since we human beings are continually arranging the bits and pieces of what we experience in order to fashion ‘a whole universe’, we must take care to look upon this welter of living beings and physical objects as ‘sometime’ things… In a similar manner, we are continually arranging bits and pieces of what we experience in order to fashion them into what we call ‘a self ’, which we treat as ‘myself ’: this is the same as the principle of ‘we ourselves are just for a time’.

Shobogenzo, Uji, Rev. Hubert Nearman

 

Thus, entering into the depths of the mountains to ponder the Buddha’s Way may well be easy, whereas to fashion a stupa or fashion a Buddha is ever so hard. Though both approaches are ripened by diligence and strenuous effort, the one makes use of the mind and the other is being used by the Mind, which is different by far. Time after time, giving rise to the enlightened Mind in this way makes the Buddhas and Ancestors manifest.

Shobogenzo, Hotsu Mujo Shin, Hubert Nearman

 

‘The branch of Right Effort’ is the daily conduct of dredging out your whole being. And through dredging out your whole being, you fashion a truly human countenance…

It is one’s Eye creating the morning star.

Shobogenzo, Sanjushichihon Bodai Bumpo, Hubert Nearman

 

Because ‘simply our mind’ is not simply our mind, so ‘the tiles and stones of our walls and fences’ are not the tiles and stones of walls and fences. This is the everyday behavior of a Buddha doing His practice, and it is the principle of leaving things to the mind and leaving things to things even while we are creating both a mind and things.

Shobogenzo, Gyobutsu Iigi, Hubert Nearman

 

By relying on the principle of ‘turning to the next’, you should, by all means, thoroughly investigate both your creating circumstances and your not creating circumstances. And by relying on the principle of ‘turning to the next’, you should thoroughly investigate both what you are concocting and what you are not concocting.

Shobogenzo, Juki, Hubert Nearman

Comments Off

The Source of the Morning Star

The Source of the Morning Star..

It is one’s Eye creating the morning star.

Zen Master Eihei Dogen (1200 – 1253), Shobogenzo, Sanjushichihon Bodai Bumpo, Hubert Nearman

Peace,

Ted

Comments Off

Dogen On Negotiating the Way – Bendowa

Kim On Dogen On Negotiating the Way

In his book, Dogen On Meditation and Thinking, Hee-Jin Kim offers an excellent statement on what this task entails. Following Masao Abe and Norman Waddell, Hee-Jin Kim translates “Bendowa” as “Negotiating the Way,” which he uses to describe what Dogen regards as the Zen “practitioners’ soteriological project.” Here is Kim:

In the Shobogenzo, “Bendowa” (1231), Dogen succinctly enunciates his Zen: “The endeavor to negotiate the Way (bendo), as I teach now, consists in discerning all things in view of enlightenment, and putting such a unitive awareness (ichinyo) into practice in the midst of the revaluated world (shutsuro).” This statement clearly sets forth practitioners’ soteriological project as negotiating the Way in terms of (1) discerning the nondual unity of all things that are envisioned from the perspective of enlightenment and (2) enacting that unitive vision amid the everyday world of duality now revalorized by enlightenment. Needless to say, these two aspects refer to practice and enlightenment that are nondually one (shusho itto; shusho ichinyo). ~Hee-Jin Kim, Dogen On Meditation and Thinking

Here, Kim skillfully expresses the fundamental point while simultaneously illumining some important implications. What he translates as “unitive awareness” is the experiential awareness (enlightened wisdom) of the nonduality of all things. As Kim so lucidly shows, the objective of the practitioner, as far as Dogen is concerned, is to “negotiate the Way” by actively utilizing this “unitive awareness” to discern (i.e. make out, distinguish, differentiate, discriminate, etc.) all things in the everyday world.

[Note: The qualifying terms “revaluated” and “revalorized” serve to emphasize the fact that the “everyday world” here means the real everyday world—as seen in view of enlightenment. This will come up later, now it is enough to note that Zen sayings about “ordinary mind” and “everyday world” are not references to what ordinary, unenlightened beings perceive as “mind” or “world.”]

Bendowa, one of Dogen’s earliest writings (perhaps his second), not only offers a good example of his view of nonduality, it also demonstrates how consistently he maintained it throughout his career. Bendowa was not included in Shobogenzo and apparently did not undergo revisions, as did most of the fascicles in Shobogenzo. Nevertheless, its strong language cautioning against distorted notions of “oneness” is remarkably harmonious with Shobogenzo fascicles edited near the end of his career. For instance, Bendowa contains Dogen’s first critique of the “Shrenika heresy,” which became a standard example for the “fallacy of naturalism” (essentialism) throughout Shobogenzo.

Peace,

Ted

Comments Off

Seven (7) Zen Masters On Words & Letters – sutras & koans (scriptures & sayings)

Seven (7) Classic Zen Masters On Sutras and Koans

-

Parshva attended the Buddhist master Punyamitre for three years, never once going to sleep. One day as Punyamitre was reciting a scripture and came to an exposition of the uncreated, Parshva attained enlightenment on hearing it.
Keizan, Transmission of Light, Thomas Cleary, p.44

-

I happened to hear that The Lotus Sutra was the king of all the scriptures… when I had finished, I closed it with a heavy sigh. “This,” I told myself, “is nothing but a collection of simple tales about cause and effect. True, mention is made of there being ‘only one absolute vehicle,’ and of ‘the changeless, unconditioned tranquillity of all dharmas.’ …
    
Meanwhile, I lived as the priest of a small temple. I reached forty, the age when one is not supposed to be bothered any longer by doubts. One night, I decided to take another look at The Lotus Sutra… I read as far as the third chapter, the one on parables. Then, just like that, all the lingering doubts and uncertainties vanished from my mind. They suddenly ceased to exist. The reason for the Lotus’s reputation as the “king of sutras” was now revealed to me with blinding clarity. Teardrops began cascading down my face like two strings of beads—they came like beans pouring from a ruptured sack. A loud involuntary cry burst from the depths of my being… I was finally able to penetrate the source of the free, enlightened activity that permeated Shoju’s daily life.
Hakuin, The Essential Teachings of Zen Master Hakuin, Norman Waddell, p.33

-

One day when Huineng went to market with a bundle of wood, he heard a traveler reciting the Diamond Cutter Scripture.  When the traveler reached the part where it says, “You should activate the mind without dwelling on anything,” Huineng experienced enlightenment.
Keizan, Transmission of Light, Thomas Cleary, p.138

-

There is another type of Zen teacher who tells people not to make logical assessments, that they lose contact the minute they speak, and should recognize the primordial. This kind of “teacher” has no explanation at all. This is like sitting on a balloon—where is there any comfort in it? It is also like the croaking of a bullfrog. If you entertain such a view, it is like being trapped in a black fog.
Foyan, Instant Zen, Thomas Cleary, p.46

-

There is originally no word for truth, but the way to it is revealed by words. The way originally has no explanation, but reality is made by explanation. That is why the buddhas appeared in the world with many expedient methods; the whole canon dispenses medicines according to diseases.
Shih-shuang, Zen Teachings, Thomas Cleary, p.51

-

From the Zen people of today, who are content to sit quietly submerged at the bottom of their “ponds of tranquil water,” you often hear this:“Don’t introspect koans. Koans are quagmires. They will suck your self-nature under. Have nothing to do with written words either. Those are a complicated tangle of vines that will grab hold of your vital spirit and choke the life from if.”
    
Don’t believe that for a minute! What kind of “self-nature” is it that can be “sucked under”? Is it like one of those yams or chestnuts you bury under the cooking coals? Any “vital spirit” that can be “grabbed and choked off” is equally dubious. Is it like when a rabbit or fox gets caught in a snare?  Where in the world do they find these things? The back shelves of some old country store? Wherever, it must be a very strange place.
    
No doubt about it, these are the miserable wretches Zen priest Ch’ang-sha said “confound the illusory working of their own minds for ultimate truth.” They’re like that great king master Ying-an T’an-hua talked about, who lives alone inside an old shrine deep in the mountains, never putting any of his wisdom to use.
Hakuin, The Essential Teachings of Zen Master Hakuin, Norman Waddell, p.24

-

One time, as Shitou was reading a famous Buddhist treatise, he came to the point where it says, “It seems that only a sage can understand that myriad things are oneself.” At this point he hit the desk and said, “A sage has no self, yet there is nothing that is not the self.  The body of reality is formless—who speaks of self and other?  The round mirror is marvelously bright—all things and the mysteries of their beings appear in it spontaneously.  Objects and knowledge are not one—who says they come or go to one another?  How true are the words of this treatise!”…

Having attained realization at a blow and succeeding in seeing clearly, he ranked as one of the Zen masters.
Keizan, Transmission of Light, Thomas Cleary, p.153

-

A bigoted believer in nihilism blasphemes against the sutras on the ground that literature [i.e., the Buddhist scriptures] is unnecessary [for the study of Buddhism]. If that were so, then neither would it be right for us to speak, since speech forms the substance of literature. He would also argue that in the direct method [literally, the straight path] literature is discarded. But does he appreciate that the two words ‘is discarded’ are also literature? Upon hearing others recite the sutras such a man would criticize the speakers as ‘addicted to scriptural authority’. It is bad enough for him to confine this mistaken notion to himself, but in addition, he blasphemes against the Buddhist scriptures. You men should know that it is a serious offence to speak ill of the sutras, for the consequence is grave indeed!
Hui-Neng, The Diamond Sutra & The Sutra of Hui-Neng, A. F. Price & Wong Mou-lam, p.144

-

When students are beginners, whether they have the mind of the Way or not, they should carefully read and study the Sagely Teachings of the sutras and shastras.
Dogen, Record of Things Heard, Col. Trans. of Thomas Cleary, Vol. 4, p.796

-

I have observed that people of the present time who are cultivating their minds do not depend on the guidance of the written teachings, but straightaway assume that the successive transmission of the esoteric idea [of Son] is the path. They then sit around dozing with their presence of mind in agitation and confusion during their practice of meditation. For these reasons, I feel you should follow words and teachings which were expounded in accordance with reality in order to determine the proper procedure in regard to awakening and cultivation. Once you mirror your own minds, you may contemplate with insight at all times, without wasting any of your efforts.
Chinul, Tracing Back the Radiance, Robert Buswell, p.151-152

-

How sad is the aridity of contemporary Zen schools! They laud unintelligent ignorance as transcendental direct-pointing Zen.  Considering unsurpassed spiritual treasures like Focusing the Precious Mirror and the Five Ranks to be worn-out utensils of an antiquated house, they pay no attention to them. They are like blind people throwing away their canes, saying they are useless, then getting themselves stuck in the mud of the view of elementary realization, never able to get out all their lives.
Hakuin, Kensho, Thomas Cleary, p.68-69

-

Peace,

Ted

Comments Off

Your Consciousness is the Buddha! – Huang Po

Zen wisdom on erroneous thoughts, your consciousness, and the Buddha

Q: At this moment, while erroneous thoughts are arising in my mind, where is the Buddha?

A: At this moment you are conscious of those erroneous thoughts. Well, your consciousness is the Buddha! Perhaps you can understand that, were you but free of these delusory mental processes, there would then be no ‘Buddha’. Why so? Because when you allow a movement of your mind to result in a concept of sentient beings in need of deliverance CREATES such beings as objects of your thoughts. All intellectual processes and movements of thought result from your concepts. If you were to refrain from conceptualizing altogether, where could the Buddha continue to exist? You are in the some predicament as Manjusri who, as soon as he permitted himself to conceive of the Buddha as an objective entity, was dwarfed and hemmed in on all sides by those two iron mountains.

~Zen Master Huang Po (Teacher of Master Linchi [Rinzai])

From, The Zen Teaching of Huang Po, Translated by John Blofeld, p.80-81

—–

Peace,

Ted

Comments Off